Clear Cell Likelihood Score (ccLS) v2.0 — Renal Mass mpMRI
ccLS v2.0 (Pedrosa & Cadeddu 2022)Five-tier MRI score (1-5) estimating the likelihood that an indeterminate solid renal mass is clear cell RCC, from T2 signal, corticomedullary enhancement, microscopic fat and ancillary features (DWI, segmental enhancement inversion, ADER).
Also searched as: kidney · ccrcc · oncocytoma · aml · kidney cancer
Information
Incomplete input
- Missing required input: macroscopic fat (yes/no); enhancing proportion.
How this tool works
The ccLS is a standardized Likert scale derived from multiparametric MRI that estimates the probability of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in an indeterminate solid renal mass; version 2.0 is the current algorithm. Eligibility requires absence of unequivocal macroscopic fat (which instead indicates classic angiomyolipoma) and enhancement in at least 25% of the mass (predominantly non-enhancing lesions are cystic and belong to the Bosniak pathway). Three major criteria are assessed in every eligible mass: T2 signal intensity relative to renal cortex (hypo-, iso- or hyperintense), corticomedullary-phase enhancement relative to cortex (intense >75%, moderate 40-75%, mild <40%), and presence of microscopic fat on chemical-shift imaging. Intensely enhancing masses with microscopic fat score 5; intensely enhancing hyper- or isointense masses without microscopic fat score 3-4 (segmental enhancement inversion tips to 3); moderately enhancing masses score 2-3 (segmental enhancement inversion tips to 2); mildly enhancing hyperintense masses score 3, isointense masses score 1-2 (marked diffusion restriction tips to 1) and hypointense masses score 1. T2-hypointense intensely enhancing masses branch on the arterial-to-delayed enhancement ratio (ADER): ADER of 1.5 or more suggests fat-poor AML (ccLS 2-3), while ADER below 1.5 suggests ccRCC (ccLS 3-4), with homogeneity and marked diffusion restriction resolving each range. In branches where microscopic fat is not otherwise used, unequivocal microscopic fat upgrades the score to at least 3. Tier meanings: 1 very unlikely, 2 unlikely, 3 intermediate, 4 likely, 5 very likely. In a multi-center evaluation the pooled proportion of ccRCC was 6% for ccLS 1, 38% for ccLS 2 (small sample), 32% for ccLS 3, 72% for ccLS 4 and 81% for ccLS 5; a ccLS of 4 or higher carried 84% malignancy.
References
- Pedrosa I, Cadeddu JA. Radiology 2022 (open access)
- Multi-center ccLS evaluation (pooled likelihoods)
- Prospective ccLS diagnostic performance
- cclsrads.com — official ccLS calculator
Implemented from the cited published sources. Educational use only; confirm against current guidelines before clinical use.
Related calculators
Same subspecialty, overlapping subject matter.