Skip to content

Wells Score for Pulmonary Embolism

Wells PE rule (Wells 2000); two-tier per Wells 2001/Christopher Study

Scores seven bedside items to classify suspected pulmonary embolism as unlikely or likely (two-tier) or low/moderate/high (three-tier), directing the workup to D-dimer testing or straight to imaging.

Also searched as: PE · pre-test probability · D-dimer · CTPA · decision rule · pretest

Criteria present (check all that apply)

Leave all unchecked if no criterion applies; the score is then 0.

Lower concern
Wells PE 0 — PE unlikely (low probability)
Score: 0
  • Total score: 0 of 12.5 possible points.
  • Two-tier: PE unlikely (cutoff 4).
  • Three-tier: low probability (low 0-1, moderate 2-6, high > 6).
  • No criteria present.
  • PE unlikely: high-sensitivity D-dimer is the usual next step (age-adjusted cutoff when > 50 y); image only if positive. If gestalt is low, also consider the PERC rule first.
Caveats
  • A probability estimate, not a diagnosis; clinician gestalt may override the rule.
  • The simplified 1-point-per-item variant (unlikely <= 1) is not implemented here.

How this tool works

The Wells PE rule weights clinical signs of DVT and the clinician's judgment that PE is the leading diagnosis at 3 points each; heart rate over 100, recent immobilization or surgery, and prior venous thromboembolism at 1.5 each; and hemoptysis and active cancer at 1 each. In the dichotomized scheme a total of 4 or less makes PE unlikely (proceed with a high-sensitivity D-dimer; image only if positive), while more than 4 makes PE likely (proceed to CT pulmonary angiography or VQ scanning). The original three-tier scheme reads 0-1 as low, 2-6 as moderate, and above 6 as high probability.

References

Implemented from the cited published sources. Educational use only; confirm against current guidelines before clinical use.

Clinical questions that use this

Vetting guides that reach for this tool.