Skip to content

HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score

HAS-BLED (Pisters 2010); interpretation per ESC 2020 AF guideline

Counts nine one-point bleeding-risk factors in anticoagulated (or candidate) atrial-fibrillation patients; a score of 3 or more flags high bleeding risk and prompts correction of modifiable factors rather than withholding anticoagulation.

Also searched as: atrial fibrillation · anticoagulation · warfarin · DOAC · af

Risk factors present (check all that apply)

Leave "labile INR" unchecked for patients on DOACs (INR monitoring not applicable).

Lower concern
HAS-BLED 0
Score: 0
  • Total score: 0 of 9 (0-2 low/moderate, >= 3 high bleeding risk).
  • No risk factors present.
  • Bleeding risk not in the high range; routine monitoring per anticoagulant and renal function.
Caveats
  • Use alongside CHA2DS2-VASc, never instead of it.
  • Labile INR applies only to vitamin-K-antagonist therapy.

How this tool works

HAS-BLED scores uncontrolled hypertension (systolic over 160), abnormal renal function, abnormal liver function, prior stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile INR on warfarin, age over 65, concomitant antiplatelet/NSAID drugs, and alcohol excess at one point each (maximum 9). A score of 3 or more denotes high bleeding risk: guidelines direct clinicians to schedule early and frequent review and to correct reversible contributors (blood-pressure control, minimizing interacting drugs, alcohol reduction, INR quality on warfarin). Critically, a high HAS-BLED is not a contraindication to oral anticoagulation — it identifies patients needing risk-factor management, not patients to be denied stroke prevention.

References

Implemented from the cited published sources. Educational use only; confirm against current guidelines before clinical use.

Related calculators

Same subspecialty, overlapping subject matter.