Deauville 5-Point Scale with Lugano Response
Deauville 5-point scale with Lugano classification (Cheson/Barrington, 2014)Scores the most intense residual FDG uptake on a lymphoma PET/CT against the mediastinal blood pool and liver (Deauville 1-5, with suffix X) and maps the score plus its change from baseline to the Lugano metabolic response category.
Also searched as: lymphoma · PET · FDG · five-point scale · metabolic response · Hodgkin · DLBCL
Information
Incomplete input
- Please provide: Deauville score (1-5) for the most intense residual uptake.
How this tool works
The Deauville five-point scale grades the hottest residual uptake visually: 1 = no uptake above background, 2 = up to mediastinal blood pool, 3 = above mediastinum but up to liver, 4 = moderately above liver, 5 = markedly above liver (at least 2-3 times the liver SUVmax) or new lesions, with X appended for new uptake unlikely to be lymphoma. The Lugano classification then assigns response: scores 1-3 (with or without a residual mass) are a complete metabolic response; 4-5 with reduced uptake versus baseline is a partial metabolic response; 4-5 without significant change is no metabolic response; and 4-5 with increased uptake or new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma is progressive metabolic disease. Scores of 3 or less are generally treated as PET-negative, although trials of treatment de-escalation may conservatively count a score of 3 as inadequate. Optional SUV entries provide a suggested score for cross-checking the visual read.
References
- Cheson BD et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3059-3068.
- Barrington SF et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the ICML Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3048-3058.
- Staging and response assessment of lymphoma: Deauville 5-point scale and Lugano metabolic response tables (open access)
Implemented from the cited published sources. Educational use only; confirm against current guidelines before clinical use.
Clinical questions that use this
Vetting guides that reach for this tool.
Related calculators
Same subspecialty, overlapping subject matter.