First-Trimester Combined Screening — Marker Pattern (T21/18/13)
Educational marker-pattern interpretation (Snijders 1999; Kagan 2008) — not FMF-certified numeric riskReads nuchal translucency, PAPP-A, and free beta-hCG as a qualitative pattern (reassuring, T21-suggestive, or T18/13-suggestive) rather than a fabricated numeric risk — a genuine patient-specific combined-test risk requires certified FMF/Astraia or laboratory software.
Also searched as: combined test · nuchal translucency · papp-a · free beta-hcg · trisomy 21 · down syndrome · trisomy 18 · trisomy 13 · fmf · nipt · first trimester screening · nt scan · beta hcg · fetal medicine
Information
Incomplete input
- Please provide: maternal age, nuchal translucency, crown-rump length, PAPP-A MoM, free beta-hCG MoM.
How this tool works
The first-trimester combined test (Nicolaides/Fetal Medicine Foundation methodology, used in national programmes such as NHS FASP) multiplies a maternal age- and gestation-specific background risk by likelihood ratios derived from nuchal translucency (NT) and the maternal serum markers PAPP-A and free beta-hCG, producing a numeric risk such as 1-in-N for trisomy 21, 18 and 13. That calculation depends on the Wright et al. (2008) NT mixture model and laboratory- and population-specific marker medians, all implemented in licensed, regularly-recalibrated software (certified FMF/Astraia systems or an accredited laboratory's own combined-test engine) — reproducing those exact coefficients outside that certified software risks generating a confident-looking but inaccurate percentage, which this app will not do. What is robust and well established in the literature is the qualitative direction each marker moves in each condition: trisomy 21 is classically associated with an increased NT, low PAPP-A (commonly cited as below about 0.4 MoM), and a raised free beta-hCG (commonly above about 2.0 MoM); trisomies 18 and 13 are classically associated with an increased NT alongside LOW values of both PAPP-A and free beta-hCG, distinguishing them from the trisomy 21 pattern; an NT of 3.5 mm or more (independent of crown-rump length) is treated as markedly increased in most protocols and prompts fetal echocardiography and detailed anomaly scanning regardless of the biochemical pattern, because increased NT is also associated with cardiac defects, other genetic syndromes, and structural anomalies beyond aneuploidy alone. This tool reports that pattern-level interpretation only. It never outputs a percentage or 1-in-N risk, and a reassuring pattern here does not exclude an elevated risk on certified combined-test or NIPT screening, which should be used for any patient-facing risk estimate.
References
- Snijders RJM, Sundberg K, Holzgreve W, Henry G, Nicolaides KH. Maternal age- and gestation-specific risk for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:167-170
- Kagan KO, Wright D, Spencer K, Molina FS, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 by free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and PAPP-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:493-502
- Wright D, Kagan KO, Molina FS, Gazzoni A, Nicolaides KH. A mixture model of nuchal translucency thickness in screening for chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:376-383
- Snijders RJM, Noble P, Sebire N, Souka A, Nicolaides KH. UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness. Lancet 1998;352:343-346
Implemented from the cited published sources. Educational use only; confirm against current guidelines before clinical use.
Related calculators
Same subspecialty, overlapping subject matter.