Known or suspected lung cancer — staging
NICE NG122; ACR AC Noninvasive Clinical Staging of Primary Lung Cancer (2019)Staging is a coverage-and-phase problem. A contrast-enhanced chest CT extended to include the liver, adrenals and lower neck comes first, before any biopsy; FDG PET-CT follows for everyone who might be treated with curative intent; brain imaging is added by histology and stage rather than by symptoms.
A mass or suspicious lesion on chest radiograph or CT, or a new histological diagnosis of lung cancer, where the treatment decision depends on stage.
Referenced decision support — confirm against your local protocol.
Decision support, not a directive. Protocols and timings shown are typical published ones — your local protocol takes precedence, and the vetting radiologist decides.
- Nodal and pleural disease is a soft-tissue contrast problem, and soft tissue only separates from vessel once the systemic venous phase has equilibrated at around 60 seconds. An arterial-timed acquisition leaves mediastinal nodes isodense with unopacified vessels and under-calls them; an unenhanced study cannot assess mediastinal or chest wall invasion at all. The coverage is part of the protocol rather than an extra: the liver and adrenals are the two commonest sites of silent metastasis in lung cancer and cost nothing to include, and the lower neck captures supraclavicular nodes that change the nodal stage.
Nothing needs resolving before this goes ahead. Routine checks below are owned downstream.
How was this decided?
- pathwayadult — Adults
- rulerule-contrast-reaction-premed — Prior contrast reaction and elective premedication; checked by Nurse before the scan
- rulerule-metformin — Metformin and iodinated contrast; checked by Radiographer at the scanner
- rulerule-paeds-dose — Child-sized technique and contrast dose; checked by Radiographer at the scanner
- rulerule-pregnancy-ionising — Pregnancy status before an ionising exposure; checked by Radiographer at the scanner
- rulerule-renal-iodinated — Kidney function and intravenous iodinated contrast; checked by Radiographer at the scanner
- rulerule-iv-access — Intravenous access adequate for the planned injection; checked by Radiographer at the scanner
Decision support only. Local protocol takes precedence.
Handled at the scanner(4)nothing for you to do
Settled and owned downstream. Each returns to a radiologist only on the stated trigger.
- Metformin and iodinated contrastConfirm whether the patient takes metformin or a metformin-containing combination, and if so whether ACR Category II applies (eGFR below 30, known or suspected AKI, or an arterial catheter study likely to cause renal embolisation). If Category I — that is, no AKI and eGFR at or above 30 — no action of any kind is needed.Radiographer at the scannerAt the scannerFlags back if: The patient takes metformin AND meets ACR Category II — eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, known or suspected acute kidney injury, or an arterial catheter procedure with likely renal arterial embolisation. Metformin plus a normal or mildly reduced eGFR is explicitly NOT a flag-back: there is no need to stop metformin before or after intravenous iodinated contrast in Category I patients, and no need to re-check creatinine afterwards.
- Child-sized technique and contrast doseConfirm that a size- or weight-based protocol is selected — child-sized kV and mAs against size-based diagnostic reference ranges — and that contrast volume is calculated by weight rather than taken from an adult default. Weight-based iodinated contrast volumes of roughly 1.5–2.0 mL/kg are widely used in paediatric CT.Radiographer at the scannerAt the scannerFlags back if: No paediatric or size-based protocol exists on the scanner for the requested examination, or the requested coverage or number of phases exceeds what the clinical question needs — for example a multiphase study where a single phase answers it, or whole-body coverage for a focal question.
- Pregnancy status before an ionising exposureMake the pregnancy enquiry immediately before the exposure and record the answer. In the UK this is a statutory operator duty discharged at the time of exposure under the employer’s written procedures required by IR(ME)R 2017 — it is not something the vetting radiologist can perform or pre-empt, and a request is complete without it.Radiographer at the scannerAt the scannerFlags back if: The patient states that she is, or may be, pregnant AND the uterus is in or near the primary beam. The exposure is then paused for re-justification by the IR(ME)R practitioner before it proceeds.
- Intravenous access adequate for the planned injectionSite and test a cannula that supports the protocol flow rate, preferring an antecubital or large forearm vein, and observe the injection for extravasation. A 20-gauge or larger cannula is preferred for flow rates of 3 mL/s or more.Radiographer at the scannerAt the scannerFlags back if: No cannula can be sited that supports the protocol flow rate — for example only a 22-gauge hand or foot cannula for a CT angiogram needing 4–5 mL/s; or the only available access is a central line or port that is not labelled power-injectable; or an extravasation occurs.
Pathways
Big forks are separate pathways; the first whose conditions match is the one used.
Adults
Matches your inputsDefault| Role | Study & protocol | Why this answers the question |
|---|---|---|
| First line | CT Chest CT Chest — Contrast-Enhanced (Venous Phase) usually appropriate | Nodal and pleural disease is a soft-tissue contrast problem, and soft tissue only separates from vessel once the systemic venous phase has equilibrated at around 60 seconds. An arterial-timed acquisition leaves mediastinal nodes isodense with unopacified vessels and under-calls them; an unenhanced study cannot assess mediastinal or chest wall invasion at all. The coverage is part of the protocol rather than an extra: the liver and adrenals are the two commonest sites of silent metastasis in lung cancer and cost nothing to include, and the lower neck captures supraclavicular nodes that change the nodal stage. |
| Second line | FDG PET-CT FDG PET-CT — skull base to mid-thigh usually appropriate | Metabolic staging finds the disease that anatomy misses — normal-sized but involved nodes, and unsuspected distant metastases that convert a planned resection into systemic treatment. It earns its place specifically in the group who could be treated with curative intent, because that is where a change in stage changes the operation. Its weakness is specificity: granulomatous and other inflammatory nodes are avid, so an isolated avid mediastinal node in a patient otherwise fit for surgery is a reason to sample, not a reason to abandon. |
| Problem solving | MRI Brain MRI Brain — with gadolinium | Contrast-enhanced brain MRI is the sensitive test for intracranial metastasis and finds lesions that CT does not, which is why it is applied by histology and stage rather than by neurological symptoms. The trigger belongs on the step rather than only in the notes: small cell disease earns brain imaging in every patient at diagnosis regardless of symptoms, and non-small cell disease earns it from stage II upwards in anyone being considered for treatment with curative intent — a meaningful minority of whom have occult intracranial disease that converts a planned resection into a different treatment altogether. FDG PET does not cover this: the normal cortex is intensely avid, so metastases are hidden in physiological background. |
Pitfalls
- Accepting a chest-only acquisition when the staging question needs the liver and adrenals — the repeat scan costs another cannula, another dose and a week of the pathway.
- Requesting PET-CT before the diagnostic contrast CT. PET without a good anatomical staging study leaves the surgical planning questions unanswered and often has to be repeated.
- Arterial-phase timing on a staging chest CT, which under-shows nodal and pleural enhancement.
- Interpreting FDG avidity as proof of malignancy. Sarcoid, tuberculosis and other granulomatous nodes are avid, and in endemic populations mediastinal specificity falls substantially.
- Omitting brain imaging in an asymptomatic small cell patient, where a meaningful proportion have occult intracranial disease at diagnosis.
- Staging a superior sulcus tumour on CT alone. A Pancoast lesion is a T-stage question about the brachial plexus, the subclavian vessels, the vertebral body and the neural foramina, and every one of those is a soft-tissue boundary that MRI resolves and CT does not — so a CT that calls a superior sulcus tumour resectable has not answered the question the surgeon asked. The same applies to any tumour abutting the spine or the chest wall where the operative plan depends on the depth of invasion.
- Treating an avid mediastinal node on PET as a staging conclusion. Nodal stage decides between resection and systemic treatment, so an isolated avid node in an otherwise operable patient is a reason for endobronchial ultrasound or mediastinoscopy — the commonest way a curable patient loses the operation is a nodal stage assigned from imaging alone.
- Ignoring a pleural effusion in a staging study. A malignant effusion is M1a disease and takes resection off the table, and the way to establish it is sampling and a CT acquired before the fluid is drained — which is a different card and a sequencing decision this one should hand over rather than assume.
Priors — what to pull first
- Find the study that first showed the lesion — an apparent T1 nodule that has been present and unchanged for three years is not the staging problem the request describes.
- If a biopsy has already been performed, note the date: post-procedural change in the same lobe should not be staged as tumour extension.
What makes a good request
- A good request states the working diagnosis, whether tissue has already been taken, and whether the patient is a candidate for treatment with curative intent — the last of these is what justifies PET-CT.
- Sequence matters: the staging CT should precede biopsy, because post-biopsy haemorrhage, pneumothorax and reactive nodal enlargement all degrade the staging read.
- Small cell and non-small cell disease diverge for brain imaging. Brain MRI is advised in all small cell patients regardless of symptoms, and in stage II and above non-small cell disease, because a substantial minority of asymptomatic patients have intracranial metastases.
Scoring this once it is done
The classification and risk tools this question ends in.
How these studies are acquired
Contrast, phases and timing for every study on the pathways above.
Confirm locally
- CT Chest — Contrast-Enhanced (Venous Phase): timings are typical — confirm against local protocol.
- Timings, contrast volumes and rates above are typical published values. Your department's protocol, scanner and patient population decide the actual numbers.
- Safety thresholds and premedication policy follow local policy where it differs from the cited guidance.
References
- NICE NG122 — Lung cancer: diagnosis and management · NICE
- ACR Appropriateness Criteria — Noninvasive Clinical Staging of Primary Lung Cancer · ACR Appropriateness Criteria
- EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for FDG PET-CT tumour imaging · EANM
- ACR Manual on Contrast Media — premedication regimens (elective oral prednisone 50 mg at 13/7/1 h plus diphenhydramine 50 mg at 1 h; methylprednisolone 32 mg at 12 and 2 h; accelerated IV hydrocortisone 200 mg or methylprednisolone 40 mg every 4 h; regimens under 4–5 h lack evidence of efficacy) · ACR Contrast Manual
- Management and Prevention of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Radiocontrast Media: A Consensus Statement from the ACR and the AAAAI. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2025. · Primary literature
- Schabelman E, Witting M. The relationship of radiocontrast, iodine and seafood allergies: a medical myth exposed. J Emerg Med. · Primary literature
- CAR/CSACI Practice Guidance for Contrast Media Hypersensitivity (2025) · Other
- ESUR Contrast Media Guidelines v10.0 / van der Molen AJ et al., Eur Radiol 2018 — stop metformin from the time of contrast administration if eGFR is below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2; patients above 30 without AKI continue normally. · ESUR
- Image Gently — child-sizing the CT dose; size-based protocols and accreditation of paediatric CT dose indices · Image Gently
- Strauss KJ et al. Image Gently: Ten Steps You Can Take to Optimize Image Quality and Lower CT Dose for Pediatric Patients (AJR) · Image Gently
- AAPM Pediatric Routine Abdomen and Pelvis CT Protocol — size-based technique parameters · Other
- The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017/1322) — Schedule 2 requires written procedures for making enquiries of individuals of childbearing potential to establish whether they are or may be pregnant or breastfeeding; the operator is responsible for the practical aspects they carry out. · RCR
- Society of Radiographers — The impact of IR(ME)R 2017 / IR(ME)R (NI) 2018 on pregnancy checking procedures · RCR
- ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Patients with Ionizing Radiation — Fetal dose <50 mGy not shown to increase risk of pregnancy loss or malformation; attributable cancer risk approximately 0.4% per 10 mGy · Other
- IAEA Radiation Protection of Patients — pregnancy enquiry is not needed for examinations in which the uterus is remote from a properly collimated primary beam (head, extremities) · Other
- Davenport MS et al. Use of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the ACR and the National Kidney Foundation. Radiology 2020. — Prophylaxis indicated for AKI or eGFR <30 not on maintenance dialysis; may be considered case-by-case at eGFR 30–44 · ACR/NKF consensus
- ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee Guidelines v10.0 — post-contrast acute kidney injury, risk factors and hydration — ESUR retains broader screening triggers (including age >60, diabetes, hypertension, single kidney) than the ACR/NKF targeted list — a genuine transatlantic disagreement · ESUR
- ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for the Use of Intravascular Contrast Media · Other
- Behrendt FF et al. Peripheral intravenous power injection of iodinated contrast media through 22G and 20G cannulas: can high flow rates be achieved safely? A clinical feasibility study. · Primary literature
- Pressure injectors for radiologists: a review — extravasation incidence and catheter/flow-rate relationships · Primary literature
Implemented from the cited published sources. Educational and workflow support only; confirm against current guidelines and local policy before clinical use.