Skip to content

Adnexal mass — characterisation and risk stratification

ACR O-RADS US v2022; O-RADS MRI

Risk-stratifying an adnexal lesion so that benign disease is left alone and malignant disease reaches a gynaecological oncology service. Ultrasound assigns the risk; MRI is the problem-solver for the genuinely indeterminate lesion; CT stages, and only once malignancy is likely.

An adnexal lesion found on ultrasound, on cross-sectional imaging done for another reason, or on examination — with or without symptoms.

Referenced decision support — confirm against your local protocol.

Decision support, not a directive. Protocols and timings shown are typical published ones — your local protocol takes precedence, and the vetting radiologist decides.

The request in front of you

Everything is optional. Leave a field alone and the answer assumes nothing — the verdict updates as you go.

Study requested

What the referrer actually asked for. It is evidence of intent, not a constraint on the right answer.

Contrast as written

What the request form says, not what it should say.

Age

Pick a band, or type an exact age if it matters.

years
Pregnancy status
Renal risk factors

The question a vetter can actually answer from the request. An explicit “none known” is a real answer, and it removes checks rather than deferring them.

Previous contrast reaction
The pathway — tap anything already done

Marking a study complete moves the answer on. A patient arrives partway through a pathway far more often than at the start of one.

Accept as requested
Pelvic ultrasound — transabdominal and transvaginal
Ultrasound pelvis (transabdominal ± transvaginal)
What we'd amend, and why
  • Transvaginal ultrasound resolves the features that drive risk — septations, solid components, papillary projections and their vascularity — at a spatial resolution no cross-sectional modality matches for a small pelvic lesion. Most lesions are classifiable as almost certainly benign on ultrasound alone, and that is what prevents a cascade of unnecessary imaging and surgery.

Nothing needs resolving before this goes ahead. Routine checks below are owned downstream.

How was this decided?
  1. pathwayany — All patients

Decision support only. Local protocol takes precedence.

Worth asking the referrer (1)

None of these hold the request up. They sharpen the protocol or the plan that follows.

  • Is the patient pre- or postmenopausal?
    The same morphology carries a different malignancy risk either side of the menopause, and the follow-up recommendation changes with it.

Pathways

Big forks are separate pathways; the first whose conditions match is the one used.

All patients

Matches your inputsDefault
RoleStudy & protocolWhy this answers the question
First line
Ultrasound pelvis (transabdominal ± transvaginal)
Pelvic ultrasound — transabdominal and transvaginal
usually appropriate
Transvaginal ultrasound resolves the features that drive risk — septations, solid components, papillary projections and their vascularity — at a spatial resolution no cross-sectional modality matches for a small pelvic lesion. Most lesions are classifiable as almost certainly benign on ultrasound alone, and that is what prevents a cascade of unnecessary imaging and surgery.
Second line
MRI Pelvis (Gynaecological)
MRI Pelvis — general gynaecological
MRI is the correct next step for the lesion ultrasound has called indeterminate. It identifies fat, blood products and fibrous tissue directly, which is how a dermoid, an endometrioma and a fibroma are separated from a malignancy, and dynamic contrast behaviour of any solid component adds specificity. It reclassifies a large share of indeterminate lesions as benign and so prevents operations.
Problem solving
CT Abdomen and Pelvis
CT Abdomen and Pelvis — Portal Venous Phase
CT is for staging once the lesion is already considered likely malignant — peritoneal disease, omental deposits, nodes and the upper abdomen. It is a poor characterisation tool for the adnexa itself, so ordering it to decide whether a cyst is benign answers the wrong question.

Pitfalls

  • Characterising an adnexal lesion on CT. A simple-looking cyst on CT can be a mucinous or borderline tumour, and a haemorrhagic cyst routinely looks solid.
  • Requesting MRI for a lesion that ultrasound has already called almost certainly benign — the additional study adds cost and anxiety without changing management.
  • Reporting an adnexal lesion without saying which risk category it falls into and what follow-up that implies; an unclassified description transfers the decision back to a clinician with less information.
  • Forgetting that a postmenopausal ovary should be small and quiet: the thresholds that are reassuring before the menopause are not reassuring after it.
  • Answering a completed indeterminate ultrasound with a request to repeat the ultrasound. The scan has already done its job — it has said the lesion is indeterminate — and the next study is MRI; sending the patient round the loop again delays a possible ovarian cancer for no gain.

Priors — what to pull first

  • Find the earliest imaging that shows the lesion. Stability over years is strong evidence of benignity and can end the pathway outright.
  • Retrieve any CA125 and, in a young woman with a solid lesion, the germ cell markers — they change the pre-test probability that the report is written against.

What makes a good request

  • Menopausal status changes both the prior probability and the reporting thresholds, so it belongs on the request.
  • The useful question is not "is this cancer" but "which pathway does this lesion belong to": discharge, interval ultrasound, MRI, or gynaecological oncology referral.
  • A structured risk-stratification report (O-RADS or an IOTA-based description) is what makes the answer actionable for the referring team.
  • This is the characterisation question, not the acute one. An adnexal mass with sudden severe pain and vomiting is a torsion request and belongs on that pathway, at that tempo — characterisation follows the ovary being saved, not the other way round.
  • Say on the request when the ultrasound has already been done and called the lesion indeterminate. That is the fact that makes MRI the correct next study rather than a study skipped ahead to, and without it the request comes back asking for the scan the patient has already had.

Confirm locally

  • Timings, contrast volumes and rates above are typical published values. Your department's protocol, scanner and patient population decide the actual numbers.
  • Safety thresholds and premedication policy follow local policy where it differs from the cited guidance.